跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论复杂调查设计下的通用假设检验与回归,未限定因果、面板或宏观金融问题,故不指定领域细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Barry I. Graubard
Edward L. Korn

复杂调查数据的假设检验:经典二次型统计量及回归应用

研究问题
面对多阶段整群、分层及不等概率抽样,如何改造经典二次型检验,以改善 Wald 推断和少量初级簇下的检验表现?
方法与思路
作者将简单随机抽样下的经典二次型视为总体参数,用设计方法估计并以重复估计近似分布,另提出修改的 Fay 程序。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,修改程序在所考察模拟中比原 Fay 与 Rao–Scott 程序更好地维持名义水平,并展示回归系数比较应用。
阅读关注点
应核对二次型的总体定义、设计估计及重复估计步骤,以及少量初级簇、较高参数维数时的修正与模拟范围。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;原假设符号显示不完整,需核对原文,且水平比较不代表普遍功效优势。

原文摘要

Sample surveys often have complex sample designs with multistage cluster sampling, stratification, and differential selection probabilities. This article is concerned with testing the null hypothesis H 0: θ = θ, where the p-dimensional parameter θ = g( μ ) and μ is a q-dimensional vector of means. The asymptotic framework that consists of a sequence of increasing finite populations is used to define μ as the limit of finite population means. As part of the inference, we use replicated estimates of variances that take into account the complex sample design. The Wald statistic can be used to test H 0. But inference for θ based on the Wald statistic can have low power. Thus an alternative to using a Wald test is pursued in this article. First, define a classical quadratic test statistic that would be used if one had a simple random sample of the population. Second, treating this quadratic form as a population parameter, use design-based methods to estimate it from the observed survey data. Last, use a replication method to approximate the distribution of this estimated quadratic form to perform the hypothesis test. Specific applications of this general approach have been used previously in contingency table analysis. For small numbers of sampled first-stage clusters and large p, modified versions of the Fay procedure are proposed. Simulations show that these modified procedures maintain nominal levels better than the original Fay and the Rao-Scott procedures for testing a vector of means and a vector of regression coefficients. An application is given for testing whether design-based regression coefficients differ from ordinary least squares regression coefficients.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文