跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般正态参数函数的区间覆盖理论,没有所列经济计量细分方向的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Max Halperin

非线性参数函数的区间估计(三)

研究问题
在两个正态均值及其方差未知时,如何为满足所述单调性和几何条件的均值函数构造区间,并判断覆盖水平?
方法与思路
作者比较从两个均值各自置信区间生成函数区间,以及从联合椭圆置信区域生成区间的程序,并考察方差估计自由度。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,第一种程序在自由度相等时至少达到名义覆盖水平;其他自由度情形未获完整证明,第二种程序未有确定结论。
阅读关注点
应核对函数等值线的几何条件、方差估计的分布与依赖要求,以及等自由度证明和随机化归约分别适用的情形。
阅读边界
索引摘要未注明稿件版本;不等自由度处的比较符号不清,需查原PDF。摘要明确未证明该情形,且未确定椭圆程序的性质。

原文摘要

Let f(μ1, μ2) = constant be a function which is monotone and has no finite termini in the (μ1, μ2) plane. Let x 1 and x 2 be either independent normal with unknown means μ1, μ2 and unknown variances σ2 1, σ2 2 or correlated normal with unknown mean vector (μ1, μ2) and unknown variance matrix σ. Suppose, in the first instance, that estimates, s 2 1 and s 2 2, of σ2 1 and σ2 2 with v 1 and v 2 degrees of freedom are available and, in the second instance, an estimate, S, of σ with v degrees of freedom is available. Let vis 2 i /σ2 i , i = 1, 2, be distributed as independent chi-squares and let vS have the Wishart distribution. Under the above assumptions we study the characteristics of two procedures for obtaining interval estimates of f(μ1, μ2). One procedure bases interval estimation of f(μ1, μ2) on separate 1 - α confidence intervals on μ1 and μ2. The other procedure bases estimation on an elliptical confidence region for (μ1, μ2). For the first procedure it is shown that the interval estimate of f(μ1, μ2) is at least at the 1 - α confidence level, providing v 1 = v 2. (which is automatically satisfied in the correlated case); if v 1 v 2 (case of independence) we give arguments which strongly suggest, but do not prove, that the same result holds. Further, for this case, if x 1 and x 2 are sample means from samples of size (v 1 + 1) and (v 2 + 1) respectively, a well known randomization argument due to Scheffe can be used to reduce the problem to the equal degree of freedom case, with no loss of precision in estimation of mean values. For the second procedure no definite conclusions are drawn.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文