跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以非线性Granger关系和预测误差为核心,并用方差风险溢价预测股权风险溢价,直接对应时间序列与收益预测。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Xiaojun Song

均值中非线性Granger因果性的度量

研究问题
如何在不指定参数模型的情况下度量并检验均值中的非线性Granger因果关系,以及方差风险溢价对股权风险溢价的预测贡献?
方法与思路
作者用受限与非受限预测的均方误差构造对数形式的指标,以非参数核估计替代未知误差,并利用渐近正态性和平滑局部自助法检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新指标能够检测并量化均值中的非线性Granger关系,建立一致性与检验理论,并在股权风险溢价应用中报告短期预测力。
阅读关注点
核对受限与非受限预测的信息集、指标定义和核估计条件,检查自助法的适用范围,以及应用中线性与非线性预测贡献的区分。
阅读边界
Granger因果性衡量给定信息下的预测增益,不能据此判定结构因果效应;摘要未说明信息集、核带宽及样本,应用结论受市场与期限限制。

原文摘要

We propose model-free measures for Granger causality in mean between random variables. Unlike the existing measures, ours are able to detect and quantify nonlinear causal effects. The new measures are based on nonparametric regressions and defined as logarithmic functions of restricted and unrestricted mean square forecast errors. They are easily and consistently estimated by replacing the unknown mean square forecast errors by their nonparametric kernel estimates. We derive the asymptotic normality of nonparametric estimator of causality measures, which we use to build tests for their statistical significance. We establish the validity of smoothed local bootstrap that one can use in finite sample settings to perform statistical tests. Monte Carlo simulations reveal that the proposed test has good finite sample size and power properties for a variety of data-generating processes and different sample sizes. Finally, the empirical importance of measuring nonlinear causality in mean is also illustrated. We quantify the degree of nonlinear predictability of equity risk premium using variance risk premium. Our empirical results show that the variance risk premium is a very good predictor of risk premium at horizons less than 6 months. We also find that there is a high degree of predictability at the 1-month horizon, that can be attributed to a nonlinear causal effect. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组