Empirical Likelihood for Right Censored Lifetime Data
右删失寿命数据的经验似然AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般右删失寿命数据的经验似然推断,未明确涉及处理效应或所列其他专门方向。
右删失寿命数据的经验似然AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
When the empirical likelihood (EL) of a parameter θ is constructed with right censored data, literature shows that − 2log (empirical likelihood ratio) typically has an asymptotic scaled chi-squared distribution, where the scale parameter is a function of some unknown asymptotic variances. Therefore, the EL construction of confidence intervals for θ requires an additional estimation of the scale parameter. Additional estimation would reduce the coverage accuracy for θ. By using a special influence function as an estimating function, we prove that under very general conditions, − 2log (empirical likelihood ratio) has an asymptotic standard chi-squared distribution with one degree of freedom. This eliminates the need for estimating the scale parameter as well as eases some of the often demanding computations of the EL method. Our estimating function yields a smaller asymptotic variance than those of Wang and Jing (2001 Wang, Q. H., and Jing, B. Y. (2001), “Empirical Likelihood for a Class of Functions of Survival Distribution With Censored Data,” Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 53, 517–527.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]) and Qin and Zhao (2007 Qin, G. S., and Zhao, Y. C. (2007), “Empirical Likelihood Inference for the Mean Residual Life Under Random Censorship,” Statistics and Probability Letters, 77, 549–557.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). Thus, it is not surprising that confidence intervals using the special influence functions give a better coverage accuracy as demonstrated by simulations.