MINIMAX REGRET TREATMENT RULES WITH FINITE SAMPLES WHEN A QUANTILE IS THE OBJECT OF INTEREST
以分位数为目标的有限样本极小极大遗憾处理规则AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究潜在结果框架下的处理决策,并以结果分布的特定分位数作为目标,直接涉及处理选择和分布效应。
以分位数为目标的有限样本极小极大遗憾处理规则AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Consider a setup in which a decision maker is informed about the population by a finite sample and, based on that sample, has to decide whether or not to apply a certain treatment. We work out finite sample minimax regret treatment rules under various sampling schemes when potential outcomes are restricted onto the unit interval. In contrast to Stoye (2009, Journal of Econometrics 151, 70–81), where the focus is on the maximization of expected utility, the focus here is instead on a particular quantile of the outcome distribution. We find that in the case where the sample consists of a fixed number of untreated and a fixed number of treated units, any treatment rule is minimax regret optimal. The same is true in the case of random treatment assignment in the sample with any assignment probability and in the case of testing an innovation when the known quantile of the untreated population equals 1/2. However, if the known quantile exceeds 1/2, then never treating is the unique optimal rule, and if it is smaller than 1/2, always treating is optimal. We also consider the case where a covariate is included.