Homogeneous Linear Predictor Models for Contingency Tables
列联表的齐次线性预测模型AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般列联表最大似然推断,虽含累积 probit 示例,但未提供离散选择行为模型的依据。
列联表的齐次线性预测模型AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Maximum likelihood (ML) inference for the class of homogeneous linear predictor (HLP) models for contingency tables is described. HLP models constrain the expected table counts m through L(m) = Xβ, where the link L is allowed to be a many-to-one, nonlinear function. Generalized log-linear, association trend, marginal cumulative probit, and conditional marginal homogeneity models are given as specific examples. ML fit results, which include point estimates, goodness-of-fit statistics, and asymptotic-based approximate distributions, are described and compared for equivalent HLP models. The results are valid for a wide variety of sampling plans including combinations of product multinomial and Poisson sampling. An important practical implication of this article is that the implementation of ML fitting and theory is straightforward, and an attractive alternative to weighted least squares estimation, for HLP models.