Drift-Aware Spectral Conformal Prediction for Non-Exchangeable Streaming Data
面向非可交换流数据的漂移感知谱共形预测AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究有季节性与漂移的非平稳数据流,并包含金融波动率实例,支持时间序列与波动率两个细分方向。
面向非可交换流数据的漂移感知谱共形预测AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Conformal prediction provides distribution-free prediction intervals under exchangeability, but many modern data streams are neither independent nor stable. They exhibit recurring regimes, changing seasonal frequencies, abrupt shifts, and gradual drift. We propose drift-aware spectral conformal prediction (DASC), a streaming uncertainty quantification framework for structured non-exchangeable data subject to distributional drift. DASC forms conformal prediction intervals using calibration residuals weighted by local spectral similarity, while a transport-based drift score monitors whether the current test distribution has moved away from past calibration regimes. When drift is mild, DASC borrows calibration residuals from structurally similar historical windows; when drift is severe, it contracts or reweights the calibration pool and updates the target miscoverage level online. The method also reports an effective sample size diagnostic that warns when a weighted conformal quantile is statistically fragile. We establish an approximate coverage bound that decomposes coverage loss into drift, residual mismatch, and weighted effective sample size. In synthetic experiments and five stress-test regimes, DASC maintains near-nominal coverage after drift where rolling, recency-weighted, and spectral-only conformal methods can under-cover. In real electricity and weather streams, DASC reduces average interval width by approximately 28% and 42%, respectively, relative to the best calibrated non-DASC baseline, while preserving calibrated or conservative coverage. A financial volatility example shows a more nuanced regime in which spectral-only calibration is competitive, but DASC retains near-nominal coverage and adds drift diagnostics.