跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论潜在结果、主分层、观察性研究中的因果识别及多重稳健估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Zhichao Jiang
Shu Yang
Peng Ding

主分层可忽略性下因果效应的多重稳健估计

研究问题
主分层由中间变量的联合潜在值定义且不可观测时,如何在观察性研究中识别并稳健估计各主层内的处理因果效应?
方法与思路
作者在主分层可忽略性下推导非参数识别式,结合处理、中间变量和结局模型构造估计量,并联系有效影响函数与调查抽样方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,三类模型中任意两类正确即可保证一致性,全部正确时具有局部效率;作者还提供模拟及两个观察性研究应用。
阅读关注点
应核对主分层可忽略性的精确定义、其他识别条件、各模型正确的组合,以及局部效率与实际推断所需的正则条件。
阅读边界
仅依据所给Crossref摘要;其他识别条件及估计细节未展开,三重稳健性不意味着任意一个模型正确即可,也不消除假设失效的风险。

原文摘要

Abstract Causal inference concerns not only the average effect of the treatment on the outcome but also the underlying mechanism through an intermediate variable of interest. Principal stratification characterizes such a mechanism by targeting subgroup causal effects within principal strata, which are defined by the joint potential values of an intermediate variable. Due to the fundamental problem of causal inference, principal strata are inherently latent, rendering it challenging to identify and estimate subgroup effects within them. A line of research leverages the principal ignorability assumption that the latent principal strata are mean independent of the potential outcomes conditioning on the observed covariates. Under principal ignorability, we derive various nonparametric identification formulas for causal effects within principal strata in observational studies, which motivate estimators relying on the correct specifications of different parts of the observed-data distribution. Appropriately combining these estimators yields triply robust estimators for the causal effects within principal strata. These triply robust estimators are consistent if two of the treatment, intermediate variable and outcome models are correctly specified, and moreover, they are locally efficient if all three models are correctly specified. We show that these estimators arise naturally from either the efficient influence functions in the semiparametric theory or the model-assisted estimators in the survey sampling theory. We evaluate different estimators based on their finite-sample performance through simulation and apply them to two observational studies.

笔记与分组