Multivariate Tests of Mean–Variance Efficiency With Possibly Non-Gaussian Errors
允许非高斯误差的均值—方差有效性多元检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确在条件与无条件资本资产定价模型中检验市场组合的均值—方差有效性,直接对应资产定价方向。
允许非高斯误差的均值—方差有效性多元检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We develop exact mean–variance efficiency tests of the market portfolio in the context of (conditional and unconditional) capital asset pricing models (CAPM), allowing for a wide class of possibly non-Gaussian error distributions. The proposed procedures are applicable in a general multivariate linear regression framework, and exactness is achieved through Monte Carlo test techniques. We also perform exact multivariate diagnostic checks. Empirical results show that the Gaussian assumption is rejected, temporal instabilities are apparent, and mean–variance efficiency is rejected over several subperiods, but finite-sample methods that allow for nonnormality and conditioning information substantially reduce the number of rejections.