跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用密度估计的偏差和速度,没有明确经济分布效应或风险应用。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
David Ruppert
Daren B. H. Cline

通过平滑经验变换降低核密度估计偏差

研究问题
能否通过反复使用估计分布函数变换数据,降低核密度估计偏差,在保持合法密度的同时达到高阶核的收敛速度?
方法与思路
作者先估计密度与分布函数,再将数据变换至近似目标分布,进行核估计并转换回原尺度,按设定次数重复这一过程。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称均匀目标及充分光滑条件下可降低偏差阶数,证明多次迭代的收敛速度,并报告模拟中相对普通核估计的改善。
阅读关注点
应核对光滑性、带宽与迭代次数条件,估计变换造成的依赖和边界问题,以及与高阶核速度等价所采用的误差标准。
阅读边界
材料为版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;速度等价不代表误差常数或有限样本表现相同,模拟改善也不能外推到所有密度。

原文摘要

A modification of kernel density estimation is proposed. The first step is ordinary kernel estimation of the density and its cdf. In the second step the data are transformed, using this estimated cdf, to an approximate uniform (or normal or other target) distribution. The density and cdf of the transformed data are then estimated by the kernel method and, by change of variable, converted to new estimates of the density and the cdf of the original data. This process is repeated for a total of $k$ steps for some integer $k$ greater than 1. If the target density is uniform, then the order of the bias is reduced, provided that the density of the observed data is sufficiently smooth. By proper choice of bandwidth, rates of squared-error convergence equal to those of higher-order kernels are attainable. More precisely, $k$ repetitions of the process are equivalent, in terms of rate of convergence, to a $2k$-th-order kernel. This transformation-kernel estimate is always a bona fide density and appears to be more effective at small sample sizes than higher-order kernel estimators, at least for densities with interesting features such as multiple modes. The main theoretical achievement of this paper is the rigorous establishment of rates of convergence under multiple iteration. Simulations using a uniform target distribution suggest that the possibility of improvement over ordinary kernel estimation is of practical significance for samples sizes as low as 100 and can become appreciable for sample sizes around 400.

笔记与分组