Hypothesis Testing for Penalized Estimating Equations with Cross-Fitted Covariance Calibration
交叉拟合协方差校准下惩罚估计方程的假设检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论惩罚估计方程、交叉拟合协方差校准与渐近检验理论,属于计量方法与推断理论,未直接对应所给微观、宏观或金融领域细分,故不选择。
交叉拟合协方差校准下惩罚估计方程的假设检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We study hypothesis testing for penalized estimators in settings where the full marginal distribution of a multivariate response is difficult to specify, such as longitudinal data with correlated measurements or high-dimensional heteroscedastic regression. Assuming that the conditional mean model is correctly specified, we establish that the penalized estimating equations admit a $\sqrt{n}$-consistent solution, even when the working covariance structure is misspecified. Our inferential target is a low-dimensional subvector of parameters associated with the mean model. We show that the resulting test statistic converges to a $χ^2$ distribution, and that its asymptotic power depends on the nuisance covariance function. To mitigate this dependence, we propose estimating the covariance function via cross-fitting, which provides a calibrated and robust procedure for inference.
双重高维线性混合模型下异质图模型的推断
Inferring the structure of population-level functional connectivity networks from multi-subject functional magnetic resonance imaging data is essential for understanding the connectivity patterns underlying cognitive and behavioral functions. Graphical models provide a formal statistical framework for inferring the graph structure. However, the multi-level nature of functional magnetic resonance imaging data---where each level corresponds, for instance, to a…
近分离二元数据中惩罚GEE的有限样本方差估计
Penalized generalized estimating equations (PGEE) stabilize point estimation for longitudinal binary data under near-separation, but inference still depends on how the sandwich variance is corrected. Existing corrections for PGEE can overadjust in high-leverage directions, require restrictive pooling assumptions, or add global regularization without explaining the bias. We establish first-order asymptotics for PGEE along convergent interior-root sequences and derive a matrix…
不可观测异质性的去偏机器学习:高维面板与测量误差模型
Developing robust inference for models with nonparametric Unobserved Heterogeneity (UH) is both important and challenging. We propose novel Debiased Machine Learning (DML) procedures for valid inference on functionals of UH, allowing for partial identification of multivariate target and high-dimensional nuisance parameters. Our main contribution is a full characterization of all relevant Neyman-orthogonal moments in models with nonparametric UH, where relevance means…
通过最小二乘近似实现自适应 LASSO 惩罚的密度幂散度估计
Linear mixed-effect panel data models are widely used in longitudinal biomedical, environmental, and social studies, but are often sensitive to data contamination and numerous covariates. To address these challenges, we propose a robust variable selection approach based on a least squares approximation (LSA) of the density power divergence (DPD) objective function combined with the Adaptive LASSO penalty. The LSA converts the nonlinear DPD objective into a computationally…
高维面板数据模型的稳健估计与推断
This paper provides the relevant literature with a complete toolkit for conducting robust estimation and inference about the parameters of interest involved in a high-dimensional panel data framework. Specifically, (1) we allow for non-Gaussian, serially and cross-sectionally correlated and heteroskedastic error processes, (2) we develop an estimation method for the high-dimensional long-run covariance matrix using a thresholded estimator, (3) we also allow for the number of…
广义线性模型中多层模型与固定效应方法的比较
We extend prior work comparing linear multilevel models (MLM) and fixed effect (FE) models to the generalized linear model (GLM) setting, where the coefficient on a treatment variable is of primary interest. This leads to three insights. (i) First, as in the linear setting, MLM can be thought of as a regularized form of FE (RegFE). This explains why group-level confounding can greatly bias MLM's treatment coefficient estimates. However, unlike the linear setting, there is…