跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是普查漏计校正与小区域复合估计,不直接对应所列细分领域。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Eugene P. Ericksen
Joseph B. Kadane
John W. Tukey

调整1980年美国人口与住房普查

研究问题
如何校正1980年人口普查中不同地区和族群的差异性漏计,并评估数据与建模假设变化对地区人口份额调整的影响?
方法与思路
作者比较合成估计与大类样本估计,并提出回归复合方法,将地区漏计率的样本估计与回归估计进行矩阵加权组合。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所考察的多种调整方法与假设变化均使少数族群较少的州份额下降、大城市份额上升,并报告一定的敏感性稳定性。
阅读关注点
应核对普查后调查的抽样与测量误差、复合权重的构造、地区与族群预测变量,以及敏感性分析覆盖的假设范围。
阅读边界
材料为OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;所报稳健性限于已考察的数据与假设,摘要不足以判断所有地区校正量的准确性。

原文摘要

In 1980, several cities and states sued the U.S. Census Bureau to correct census results. This correction would adjust for the differential undercounting of Blacks and Hispanics, especially in cities. In this article, the authors, each of whom testified for New York City and State in their joint lawsuit against the Census Bureau, describe the likely pattern of the undercount and present a method to adjust for it. We first explain why the undercount is concentrated among minority populations living in large cities. We describe the demographic and survey data available for adjustment from the Census Bureau's Post Enumeration Program. We present adjustment results obtained by two simple methods—synthetic estimation, and sample estimation for a few large subclasses. The Census Bureau used the latter method, known as the National Vacancy Check, to adjust the results of the 1970 census. We also describe our regression-based, composite method for adjustment. This method takes sample estimates of the undercount rate for a set of mutually exclusive geographic areas, and regresses these estimates upon available predictor variables. The composite estimates of the undercount rate are matrix-weighted averages of the original sample and regression estimates. We compute estimates for 66 areas: 16 large cities, the remainders of the 12 states in which those cities are located, and 38 whole states. As expected, we find that the highest undercount rates are in large cities, and the lowest are in states and state remainders with small percentages of Blacks and Hispanics. Next, we analyze how sensitive our estimates are to changes in data and modeling assumptions. We find that these changes do not affect the estimates very much. Our conclusion is that regardless of whether we use one of the simple methods or the composite method and regardless of how we vary the assumptions of the composite method, an adjustment reliably reduces population shares in states with few minorities and increases the shares of large cities.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文