跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论两阶段抽样和缺失协变量下的一般关联估计,未明确属于所列因果、面板或其他具体方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Q Zhou
K Y Wong

两阶段抽样研究的最优两步估计方法

研究问题
当大样本仅观测结局与廉价协变量、昂贵协变量只在第二阶段子样本获得时,如何利用全部信息改善关联参数估计?
方法与思路
作者先用完整观测获得初始估计,再利用全样本工作模型产生的渐近均值为零估计量更新,并提出核方法及多模型联合更新。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该类估计量渐近效率不低于初始估计且对工作模型误设稳健;核方法达到类内最优效率,多模型更新提供近似方案。
阅读关注点
应核对第二阶段抽样机制与权重、更新量均值为零的依据、最优性限定的估计量类别,以及核方法不可行时的替代条件。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 Crossref 摘要;摘要未说明抽样与缺失机制的完整条件,类内最优不等于总体半参数有效,也未提供具体效率增益。

原文摘要

Summary Two-phase sampling is commonly adopted for reducing cost and improving estimation efficiency. In many two-phase studies, the outcome and some cheap covariates are observed for a large sample in Phase I, and expensive covariates are obtained for a selected subset of the sample in Phase II. As a result, the analysis of the association between the outcome and covariates faces a missing data problem. Complete-case analysis, which relies solely on the Phase II sample, is generally inefficient. In this paper, we study a two-step estimation approach, which first obtains an estimator using the complete data, and then updates it using an asymptotically mean-zero estimator obtained from a working model between the outcome and cheap covariates using the full data. This class of two-step estimators are asymptotically at least as efficient as the complete-data estimator and are robust to misspecification of the working model. We propose a kernel-based method to construct a two-step estimator that achieves optimal efficiency within this class of estimators. Additionally, we develop a simple joint update approach based on multiple working models to approximate the optimal estimator when a fully nonparametric kernel approach is infeasible. We illustrate the proposed methods with various outcome models. We demonstrate their advantages over existing approaches through simulation studies and provide an application to a major cancer genomics study.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文