跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究临床生存风险的跨队列校准,未涉及金融风险、宏观预测或其他所列领域的直接问题。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jiayin Zheng
Yingye Zheng
Li Hsu

结合目标总体汇总统计与源总体个体数据的事件发生风险外推

研究问题
当源与目标队列的基础发病水平及人群构成不同,如何利用目标队列汇总信息校准事件发生风险,减少风险外推的系统偏差?
方法与思路
作者假设两队列预测变量的相对风险相同,利用目标生存概率、竞争事件及风险因素汇总信息,通过加权估计方程更新基线风险。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,估计量具有一致性与渐近正态性;在目标信息精确时,模拟展示对风险因素分布差异的稳健表现及特定情形的效率增益。
阅读关注点
应核对相对风险可迁移假设、竞争事件的处理、汇总信息与权重构造,以及目标信息误差如何影响估计和推断。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;具体迁移与正则条件未说明,稳健性陈述受相对风险不变及目标信息精确等条件限制。

原文摘要

Predicting risks of chronic diseases has become increasingly important in clinical practice. When a prediction model is developed in a cohort, there is a great interest to apply the model to other cohorts. Due to potential discrepancy in baseline disease incidences between different cohorts and shifts in patient composition, the risk predicted by the model built in the source cohort often under- or over-estimates the risk in a new cohort. In this article, we assume the relative risks of predictors are the same between the two cohorts, and propose a novel weighted estimating equation approach to re-calibrating the projected risk for the targeted population through updating the baseline risk. The recalibration leverages the knowledge about survival probabilities for the disease of interest and competing events, and summary information of risk factors from the target population. We establish the consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed estimators. Extensive simulation demonstrate that the proposed estimators are robust, even if the risk factor distributions differ between the source and target populations, and gain efficiency if they are the same, as long as the information from the target is precise. The method is illustrated with a recalibration of colorectal cancer prediction model.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文