Bridging Local and Population Causal Effects: A Proximal Instrumental Variable Approach
连接局部与总体因果效应:近端工具变量方法AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接讨论工具变量、依从者局部平均效应与总体平均效应,并以代理变量识别和双重稳健估计为核心,属于因果推断。
连接局部与总体因果效应:近端工具变量方法AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Instrumental variable (IV) methods address treatment endogeneity, but with non-compliance and heterogeneous treatment effects a binary instrument generally identifies the local average treatment effect (LATE) among compliers rather than the population average treatment effect (ATE). When treatment effects and compliance probabilities are heterogeneous and dependent through latent factors, the ATE need not be identified by IV variation alone. We develop a proximal instrumental variable framework that uses proxies for these factors to adjust for the compliance weighting in LATE and recover the ATE. We show that the ATE is identified through either an outcome bridge capturing latent treatment effect heterogeneity or a compliance bridge representing inverse compliance probabilities, and combining the two yields a doubly robust representation. We derive the efficient influence function under known and unknown instrument propensities. For estimation, we propose regularized kernel minimax bridge estimators, with orthogonalized conditional moments for estimated propensity, and a three-way sequential cross-fitting scheme. We establish projected bridge-risk bounds, and give conditions for asymptotic normality and semiparametric efficiency. The framework provides a proxy-based route from local IV effects to population causal effects under latent treatment effect and compliance heterogeneity.