Nonparametric Estimates of Demand in the California Health Insurance Exchange
加州医保交易市场需求的非参数估计AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要明确使用离散选择需求模型，并估计医保政策反事实中的消费者剩余与政府支出。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
加州医保交易市场需求的非参数估计
- 研究问题
- 在保费内生且未观测效用分布不作参数化设定时，如何评估保费和补贴变化对参保选择、消费者剩余及财政支出的影响？
- 方法与思路
- 作者提出允许内生价格与工具变量的非参数离散选择方法，用于估计不同保费及补贴政策下需求和福利变化的界限。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要报告参保、消费者剩余与补贴支出的区间估计，并展示年龄补贴调整及计划移除分析与混合 logit 结果之间的差异。
- 阅读关注点
- 核对工具变量的有效性与支持条件、界限的识别和推断方法，以及消费者剩余计算和政策反事实所需的模型限制。
- 阅读边界
- 仅据所给 Crossref 摘要，工具变量、样本构造及识别条件未说明。区间结果依赖研究设定，不能理解为任意政策变化的普遍效果。
原文摘要
We develop a new nonparametric approach for discrete choice and use it to analyze the demand for health insurance in the California Affordable Care Act marketplace. The model allows for endogenous prices and instrumental variables, while avoiding parametric functional form assumptions about the unobserved components of utility. We use the approach to estimate bounds on the effects of changing premiums or subsidies on coverage choices, consumer surplus, and government spending on subsidies. We find that a $10 decrease in monthly premium subsidies would cause a decline of between 1.8% and 6.7% in the proportion of subsidized adults with coverage. The reduction in total annual consumer surplus would be between $62 and $74 million, while the savings in yearly subsidy outlays would be between $207 and $602 million. We estimate the demand impacts of linking subsidies to age, finding that shifting subsidies from older to younger buyers would increase average consumer surplus, with potentially large impacts on enrollment. We also estimate the consumer surplus impact of removing the highly‐subsidized plans in the Silver metal tier, where we find that a nonparametric model is consistent with a wide range of possibilities. We find that comparable mixed logit models tend to yield price sensitivity estimates toward the lower end of the nonparametric bounds, while producing consumer surplus impacts that can be both higher and lower than the nonparametric bounds depending on the specification of random coefficients.