跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确使用随机实验比较项目影响,并通过优化模型和计量模型分解规则引发的行为反应,对应因果与结构分析。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
David Card
Dean R. Hyslop

长期福利领取者收入补贴的动态效应:自立项目申请者实验的证据

研究问题
等待资格、限期就业和补贴支付三阶段规则,如何影响新进入福利体系者的福利参与,并在补贴结束后产生持续效应?
方法与思路
作者结合简单优化模型、随机处理组与控制组比较,以及福利参与和项目资格状态的计量模型,分解规则相关行为效应。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,项目首年提高福利参与、随后五年降低参与;三类激励均引发明显反应,补贴结束后效应持续但逐渐衰减。
阅读关注点
应核对随机分配与样本跟踪情况、三个激励效应分别识别所需的模型限制,以及补贴结束后动态效应的估计方式。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,无法判断效应大小、失访处理和模型分解的识别条件;随机比较的结论不能直接替代机制识别。

原文摘要

In the Self Sufficiency Project Applicant Experiment, new welfare entrants were informed that if they remained on public assistance for a year they would become eligible to receive a generous earnings subsidy offer. Those who satisfied the waiting period, and then left welfare and began working full time within the following year, were entitled to receive payments for up to 36 months whenever they were off welfare and working full time. A simple optimizing model suggests that the program rules created an unusual sequence of incentives: (1) to prolong the initial spell on welfare for at least 12 months to become eligible for the subsidy offer; (2) to lock in subsidy entitlement by finding full time work and leaving welfare in the 12-24 month period after initial entry; and (3) to choose work over welfare during the three years that subsidies were available. Consistent with these implications, comparisons between the experimental treatment group and a randomly assigned control group show that the program increased welfare participation in the first year after initial entry and lowered it over the following 5 years. We develop an econometric model of welfare participation and program eligibility status that allows us to separately identify the behavioral effects associated with the program rules. We find important responses to all three incentives, and that the program impact persisted after subsidy payments ended, although the effect decayed over time.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文