跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确构建并校准搜寻模型,同时使用美国州级数据进行双向固定效应分析。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Stéphane Auray
David L. Fuller

领取资格、经验费率与失业保险申领

研究问题
企业因经验费率税制而质疑失业保险申领,是否形成影响领取率的内生成本,并改变福利调整对失业和产出的影响?
方法与思路
作者建立包含固定行政成本和企业质疑成本的搜寻模型,结合美国州级双向固定效应分析,以回归隐含弹性校准模型。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称错误拒付与领取率显著负相关,校准结果量化企业质疑的成本占比,并表明内生成本会减缓失业率对福利变化的响应。
阅读关注点
核对州级回归中相关关系的解释、双向固定效应设定、弹性到成本参数的校准映射,以及取消资格要求的反事实假定。
阅读边界
仅据 Crossref 摘要,回归识别条件及校准不确定性未说明。显著相关不能直接证明因果,成本份额和反事实结果依赖模型设定。

原文摘要

In this paper, we investigate the causes and consequences of “unclaimed” unemployment insurance (UI) benefits. A search model is developed where the costs to collecting UI benefits include both a traditional “fixed” administrative cost and an endogenous cost arising from worker and firm interactions. Experience rated taxes give firms an incentive to challenge a worker's UI claim, and these challenges are costly for the worker. Exploiting data on improper denials of UI benefits across states in the U.S. system, a two‐way fixed effects analysis shows a statistically significant negative relationship between the improper denials and the UI take‐up rate, providing empirical support for our model. We calibrate the model to elasticities implied by the two‐way fixed effects regression to quantify the relative size of these UI collection costs. The results imply that on average the costs associated with firm challenges of UI claims account for 41% of the total costs of collecting, with improper denials accounting for 8% of the total cost. The endogenous collection costs imply the unemployment rate responds much slower to changes in UI benefits relative to a model with fixed collection costs. Finally, removing all eligibility requirements and allowing workers to collect UI benefits without cost shows these costs to be 4.5% of expected output net of vacancy costs. Moreover, this change has minimal impact on the unemployment rate.

笔记与分组