跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究医学预后与生存风险预测,既非宏观预测也非金融尾部风险,缺少所列细分的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
R Day

适用于预测的二元脆弱性模型:生物标志物预后应用

研究问题
观察到生物标志物变化时,如何更新个体未来事件风险,并在适合预测的删失过程中评估标志物的预后信息?
方法与思路
作者调整脆弱性模型以适应预测场景的删失过程,提出预测导向检验及估计程序,通过汇总各地标分析对应的鞅实现。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法针对现有脆弱性分析中不适合预测的删失假设作出调整,并提供面向标志物出现后风险更新的检验与估计。
阅读关注点
核对预测时点和可用信息、相关删失过程的设定,以及并行地标分析的鞅如何汇总并形成有效检验和估计。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,版本未注明;摘要没有预测性能、临床决策阈值或干预效果,不能将风险预测解释为因果效应。

原文摘要

Serial biological markers are often used in medicine as prognostic indicators. For example, elevated tumour antigen tests presage tumour recurrence; rapid decrease in the CD4 cell counts of HIV + individuals indicate high risk for developing AIDS. Methods for evaluating the usefulness of markers should address how the prediction of future risk is revised, in a way that assists the making of decisions at the time such an indicator is observed. Proportional hazards modelling with time-varying covariates, a common approach, seems unnatural for this purpose because its orientation is explanatory; it addresses the question ‘Is the individual suffering a failure more likely to have had the marker?’, and allows use of all information prior to the failure, rather than the more relevant predictive question ‘Does the appearance of the marker alter the individual's subsequent risk enough to warrant intervention today?’. Frailty models do address this question, but available methods for their analysis make censoring assumptions which are inappropriate in the predictive setting. We adapt frailty models to relevant censoring processes, and propose a predictively oriented test statistic and a related estimation procedure based on summing concurrent martingales, each representing a ‘landmark’ analysis.

笔记与分组