跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用聚类与广义贝叶斯计算,没有明确涉及所列计量领域细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Tommaso Rigon
Amy H Herring
David B Dunson

概率聚类的广义贝叶斯框架

研究问题
如何在不指定完整数据似然的情况下,为 k-means 等基于损失的聚类方法提供概率解释,并量化聚类结果的不确定性?
方法与思路
作者以聚类损失替代贝叶斯更新中的对数似然,构造 Gibbs 后验,考虑 Bregman 散度及成对相似性损失并开发计算算法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该框架连接损失聚类与概率聚类,使若干现有算法可解释为广义贝叶斯估计,并支持计算数据点聚类可靠性的概率。
阅读关注点
应核对损失函数与后验构造的关系、影响后验集中的调节参数、点估计算法及采样算法,以及不确定性概率的解释依据。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断后验不确定性的频率学性质、调节参数选择和计算稳定性;未给出具体性能比较结果。

原文摘要

Summary Loss-based clustering methods, such as k-means clustering and its variants, are standard tools for finding groups in data. However, the lack of quantification of uncertainty in the estimated clusters is a disadvantage. Model-based clustering based on mixture models provides an alternative approach, but such methods face computational problems and are highly sensitive to the choice of kernel. In this article we propose a generalized Bayes framework that bridges between these paradigms through the use of Gibbs posteriors. In conducting Bayesian updating, the loglikelihood is replaced by a loss function for clustering, leading to a rich family of clustering methods. The Gibbs posterior represents a coherent updating of Bayesian beliefs without needing to specify a likelihood for the data, and can be used for characterizing uncertainty in clustering. We consider losses based on Bregman divergence and pairwise similarities, and develop efficient deterministic algorithms for point estimation along with sampling algorithms for uncertainty quantification. Several existing clustering algorithms, including k-means, can be interpreted as generalized Bayes estimators in our framework, and thus we provide a method of uncertainty quantification for these approaches, allowing, for example, calculation of the probability that a data point is well clustered.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文