跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确针对时间序列回归的异方差与自相关稳健推断,并讨论谱密度估计和核选择,直接对应时间序列方法。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
James H. Stock

Newey–West在一阶核中是否最优?

研究问题
使用Bartlett核的Newey–West标准误,是否在一阶核中具有最优性;若最优核不存在,应如何比较不同核的渐近表现?
方法与思路
作者分析低于二阶的核空间及其分解,研究高斯位置模型的稳健检验和谱密度估计均方误差,并用给定泛函比较候选核。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,低于二阶时不存在所讨论意义下的最优核,但可比较给定核集合;考察的一阶候选核中,没有改善Bartlett表现的核。
阅读关注点
应核对核的允许集合与最优性准则,区分不存在全局最优与候选集合比较,并关注平滑参数和固定比例临界值的配套使用。
阅读边界
仅依据所给出版社摘要;具体证明条件及比较数值未说明,候选核未超越Bartlett并不意味着Bartlett是一阶核中的全局最优。

原文摘要

Newey–West (1987) standard errors are the dominant standard errors used for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation robust (HAR) inference in time series regression. The Newey–West estimator uses the Bartlett kernel, which is a first-order kernel, meaning that its characteristic exponent, q, is equal to 1, where q is defined as the largest value of r for which the quantity k[r](0)=limt→0|t|−r(k(0)−k(t)) is defined and finite. This raises the apparently uninvestigated question of whether the Bartlett kernel is optimal among first-order kernels. We demonstrate that, for q<2, there is no optimal qth-order kernel for HAR testing in the Gaussian location model or for minimizing the MSE in spectral density estimation. In fact, for any q<2, the space of qth-order positive-semidefinite kernels is not closed and, moreover, all continuous qth-order kernels can be decomposed into a weighted sum of qth and second-order kernels, which suggests that there is no meaningful notion of ‘pure’ qth-order kernels for q<2. Nevertheless, it is possible to rank any given collection of qth-order kernels using the functional Iq[k]=k[q](0)1/q∫k2(t)dt with smaller values corresponding to better asymptotic performance. We examine the value of Iq[k] for a wide variety of first-order estimators and find that none improve upon the Bartlett kernel. These comparisons provide additional justification for the continued use of the Newey–West estimator with testing-optimal smoothing parameters and fixed-b critical values despite the lack of optimality of Bartlett among first-order kernels.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文