Longitudinal Outcomes Truncated by Death: Causal Estimands and Bayesian Estimators
被死亡截断的纵向结局:因果估计目标与贝叶斯估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究随机试验中死亡截断结局的因果估计目标、识别与估计。
被死亡截断的纵向结局:因果估计目标与贝叶斯估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In randomized controlled trials with longitudinal outcomes, death before the end of follow-up poses a fundamental challenge: after death, the outcome is no longer a real-valued measurement. This complicates the definition and interpretation of causal estimands, particularly when treatment may affect both survival and longitudinal outcomes. We review existing estimands for longitudinal outcomes truncated by death and clarify the assumptions required for their identification and estimation. We show that these estimands fall into two broad classes, distinguished by whether they require additional assumptions to compare longitudinal outcomes beyond death. Such assumptions may be inappropriate in chronic diseases, either because i) death and longitudinal outcomes are driven by the same underlying biological process or ii) the relative desirability of survival with poor function versus death may depend on individual preferences. We compare the behavior of the estimands in a simulation study using Bayesian estimators and illustrate their use with data from a randomized controlled trial in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. We argue that, in the presence of death truncation, pairing the survivor average causal effect with the restricted mean survival time estimand provides an interpretable characterization of treatment effects on longitudinal and survival outcomes.