跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确分析非随机整群处理分配下,处理效应结论对未观测选择偏差的敏感性。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ben B. Hansen
Paul R. Rosenbaum
Dylan S. Small

观察研究中的整群处理分配与未观测偏差敏感性

研究问题
处理按整群而非个体分配时,抽样变异增加与未观测偏差敏感性降低如何权衡?摘要关注配对整群观察研究中的处理效应。
方法与思路
作者通过设计敏感度、利用凸性的若干不等式及模拟分析整群分配的影响,并用孟加拉国村庄洪水研究说明应用。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在其考察设定中,整群分配虽增大抽样变异,但随配对群数增加,对未观测偏差较低的敏感性可主导这种损失。
阅读关注点
应核对群级偏差限制、配对质量与渐近框架,并检查何种分配偏差和群内结构使敏感性改善足以抵消抽样变异增加。
阅读边界
依据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;主导关系的具体条件未列出,不能推广为整群设计总是更优或已消除混杂。

原文摘要

Clustered treatment assignment occurs when individuals are grouped into clusters prior to treatment and whole clusters, not individuals, are assigned to treatment or control. In randomized trials, clustered assignments may be required because the treatment must be applied to all children in a classroom, or to all patients at a clinic, or to all radio listeners in the same media market. The most common cluster randomized design pairs 2S clusters into S pairs based on similar pretreatment covariates, then picks one cluster in each pair at random for treatment, the other cluster being assigned to control. Typically, group randomization increases sampling variability and so is less efficient, less powerful, than randomization at the individual level, but it may be unavoidable when it is impractical to treat just a few people within each cluster. Related issues arise in nonrandomized, observational studies of treatment effects, but in this case one must examine the sensitivity of conclusions to bias from nonrandom selection of clusters for treatment. Although clustered assignment increases sampling variability in observational studies, as it does in randomized experiments, it also tends to decrease sensitivity to unmeasured biases, and as the number of cluster pairs increases the latter effect overtakes the former, dominating it when allowance is made for nontrivial biases in treatment assignment. Intuitively, a given magnitude of departure from random assignment can do more harm if it acts on individual students than if it is restricted to act on whole classes, because the bias is unable to pick the strongest individual students for treatment, and this is especially true if a serious effort is made to pair clusters that appeared similar prior to treatment. We examine this issue using an asymptotic measure, the design sensitivity, some inequalities that exploit convexity, simulation, and an application concerned with the flooding of villages in Bangladesh.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文