Large-Scale Two-Sample Comparison of Support Sets
支撑集的大规模两样本比较AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论稀疏参数支撑集比较与通用多重检验,高斯图模型应用不足以确定所列经济网络等领域细分。
支撑集的大规模两样本比较AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Two-sample multiple testing has a wide range of applications. Most of the literature considers simultaneous tests of equality of parameters. The article takes a different perspective and investigates the null hypotheses that the two support sets are equal. This formulation of the testing problem is motivated by the fact that in many applications where the two parameter vectors being compared are both sparse, one might be more concerned about the detection of differential sparsity structures rather than the difference in parameter magnitudes. Focusing on this type of problem, we develop a general approach, which adapts the newly proposed symmetry data aggregation tool combined with a novel double thresholding (DT) filter. The DT filter first constructs a sequence of pairs of ranking statistics that fulfill global symmetry properties and then chooses two data-driven thresholds along the ranking to simultaneously control the False Discovery Rate (FDR) and maximize the number of rejections. Several applications of the methodology are given including high-dimensional linear models and Gaussian graphical models. We show that the proposed method is able to asymptotically control the FDR and have power guarantee under certain conditions. Numerical results confirm the effectiveness and robustness of DT in FDR control and detection ability. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.