跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究稀疏网络与随机图总体之间的双样本检验。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

非齐次随机图的双样本假设检验

研究问题
当每组只有一个或少数大型稀疏网络时,能否区分同一顶点集上的两个非齐次随机图总体,答案如何依赖距离选择?
方法与思路
作者从极小极大检验角度推导不同距离下的分离率,并构造接近最优、能够适应图稀疏程度的双样本检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,小样本下部分距离使问题难以区分;每组多于一个图时两类矩阵范数可行,单图时仅算子范数分离率较小。
阅读关注点
应核对图模型、稀疏度和分离率的具体条件,重点比较总变差、Frobenius 范数与算子范数对应的可检验范围。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;具体分离率与模型条件未说明,“可行”需按文中距离和极小极大标准理解。

原文摘要

The study of networks leads to a wide range of high-dimensional inference problems. In many practical applications, one needs to draw inference from one or few large sparse networks. The present paper studies hypothesis testing of graphs in this high-dimensional regime, where the goal is to test between two populations of inhomogeneous random graphs defined on the same set of $n$ vertices. The size of each population $m$ is much smaller than $n$, and can even be a constant as small as 1. The critical question in this context is whether the problem is solvable for small $m$. We answer this question from a minimax testing perspective. Let $P$, $Q$ be the population adjacencies of two sparse inhomogeneous random graph models, and $d$ be a suitably defined distance function. Given a population of $m$ graphs from each model, we derive minimax separation rates for the problem of testing $P=Q$ against $d(P,Q)>\rho $. We observe that if $m$ is small, then the minimax separation is too large for some popular choices of $d$, including total variation distance between corresponding distributions. This implies that some models that are widely separated in $d$ cannot be distinguished for small $m$, and hence, the testing problem is generally not solvable in these cases. We also show that if $m>1$, then the minimax separation is relatively small if $d$ is the Frobenius norm or operator norm distance between $P$ and $Q$. For $m=1$, only the latter distance provides small minimax separation. Thus, for these distances, the problem is solvable for small $m$. We also present near-optimal two-sample tests in both cases, where tests are adaptive with respect to sparsity level of the graphs.

笔记与分组