Group Duration Analysis of the Proportional Hazard Model: Minimum Chi-Squared Estimators and Specification Tests
分组持续期比例风险模型:最小卡方估计与设定检验AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:内容是分组生存数据的半参数估计与设定检验,未明确对应所列经济学领域细分。
分组持续期比例风险模型:最小卡方估计与设定检验AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This article develops a semiparametric, minimum chi-squared estimation method of the proportional hazard model for the case when durations are grouped and covariates are categorical. The proposed estimator is easy to compute, yet asymptotically as efficient as the maximum likelihood estimator. This article also suggests simple specification tests for the proportional hazard model. If proportionality holds, then two sets of minimum chi-squared estimators, one from a further grouped data and the other from the original grouped data, will converge to the same quantity; otherwise, they will not. Therefore, a test of the equality of these two sets of estimators will offer a test for proportionality. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate the performance of these estimators and specification tests. In addition, two real data applications illustrate the implementation of the suggested methods and the contexts in which these methods are useful.
This article introduces a framework for evaluating statistical decisions under both prior ambiguity and likelihood misspecification. We begin with an ambiguity set - a frequentist model that pairs a possibly misspecified likelihood with every possible prior - and uniformly expand it by a Kullback-Leibler radius to accommodate likelihood misspecification. We show that optimal decisions under this framework are equivalent to minimax decisions with an exponentially tilted loss…
弱依赖非线性时间序列模型准似然估计量的一致高斯近似
We study estimation and inference for a semiparametric class of time series models that specify only the conditional expectation, which is a known link function applied to a linear combination of past observations and covariates. The class covers count, binary, bounded and conditionally heteroskedastic responses within a single formulation, and the parameter is estimated by a quasi-likelihood estimating equation based on the first conditional moment. Under stationarity and a…
靶向深度生存对比:神经网络下处理特定生存收益的有效推断
Neural survival models are increasingly asked to support counterfactual claims---how much a treatment would change survival in a population---rather than only prognostic risk scores. Answering such questions from observational data requires valid inference for treatment-specific survival contrasts under confounding and covariate-dependent censoring, targets for which standard deep survival estimators are biased and provide no honest uncertainty. We propose Targeted Deep…
竞争风险生存结局的亚组平均处理效应双重稳健目标估计
In recent years, precision treatment strategies have gained significant attention in medical research, particularly for patient care. We propose a novel framework for estimating subgroup average treatment effects (ATE) in time-to-event data with competing risks, using ICU patients with sepsis as an illustrative example. Our approach, based on cumulative incidence functions and targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), achieves both asymptotic efficiency and double…
用多项式最大化方法估计具有非对称非高斯新息的 ARIMA 模型
Classical estimators for ARIMA parameters (MLE, CSS, OLS) assume Gaussian innovations, an assumption frequently violated in financial and economic data exhibiting asymmetric distributions with heavy tails. We develop and validate the second-order polynomial maximization method (PMM2) for estimating ARIMA$(p,d,q)$ models with non-Gaussian innovations. PMM2 is a semiparametric technique that exploits higher-order moments and cumulants without requiring full distributional…
通向同一答案的三条路径:协调 AIPW、TMLE 与双重机器学习
Augmented inverse-probability weighting (AIPW), targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), and double/debiased machine learning (DML) are three routes to the same efficient influence function for the average treatment effect --- settled theory we treat as background. This tutorial's contribution is its worked, shared-nuisance reconciliation on real data: what a practitioner must actually match for the routes, and the software packages, to agree. Working the effect of…