跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于通用贝叶斯模型检验与校准理论,未提供所列经济计量细分领域的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者

后验预测 p 值的后处理校准

研究问题
后验预测 p 值通常不服从均匀分布,如何校准其尺度,使贝叶斯模型检验及不同先验与模型之间的比较更易解释?
方法与思路
作者对后验预测 p 值进行校准,通常通过双重模拟计算校准值,将不同模型设定下的意外程度置于统一尺度。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,校准后的值在模型条件下服从单位区间均匀分布,可用于比较先验与模型,包括参数和非参数设定,并提供理论结果。
阅读关注点
应核对均匀性所依据的概率机制与模型条件、差异度量及双重模拟步骤,并查看校准后的检验能力和计算成本。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;均匀性条件、功效及计算误差未提供,不能把共同尺度直接等同于模型选择最优性。

原文摘要

This article addresses issues of model criticism and model comparison in Bayesian contexts, and focuses on the use of the so-called posterior predictive p values (ppp). These involve a general discrepancy or conflict measure and depend on the prior, the model, and the data. They are used in statistical practice to quantify the degree of surprise or conflict in data and to compare different combinations of prior and model. The distribution of such ppp values is far from uniform however, as we demonstrate for different models, making their interpretation and comparison a difficult matter. We propose a natural calibration of the ppp values, where the resulting cppp values are uniform on the unit interval under model conditions. The cppp values, which in general rely on a double-simulation scheme for their computation, may then be used to assess and compare different priors and models. Our methods also make it possible to compare parametric and nonparametric model specifications, in that genuine “measures of surprise” are put on the same canonical uniform scale. We illustrate our techniques for some applications to real data. We also present supplementing theoretical results on various properties of the ppp and cppp.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文