跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究多变点检测及变点数量选择,对应结构变化方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Changliang Zou
Guanghui Wang
Runze Li

通过样本分割一致选择变点数量

研究问题
在多变点分析中,如何减少对模型及误差分布相关惩罚项的依赖,以数据驱动方式选择变点数量并避免过拟合?
方法与思路
作者提出保持观测顺序的样本分割交叉验证,以新样本的平方预测误差选择变点数,可结合二分分割和最优分段算法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该准则在一定条件下具有渐近选择一致性,并通过多种数值实验及真实数据例子展示其有效性。
阅读关注点
应核对样本如何按顺序分割、预测误差如何计算,以及一致性对变点间距、信号强度和误差结构的具体要求。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;所谓温和条件未展开,不能判断短区段、弱变点或相关误差下的表现,也不推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

In multiple change-point analysis, one of the major challenges is to estimate the number of change-points. Most existing approaches attempt to minimize a Schwarz information criterion which balances a term quantifying model fit with a penalization term accounting for model complexity that increases with the number of change-points and limits overfitting. However, different penalization terms are required to adapt to different contexts of multiple change-point problems and the optimal penalization magnitude usually varies from the model and error distribution. We propose a data-driven selection criterion that is applicable to most kinds of popular change-point detection methods, including binary segmentation and optimal partitioning algorithms. The key idea is to select the number of change-points that minimizes the squared prediction error, which measures the fit of a specified model for a new sample. We develop a cross-validation estimation scheme based on an order-preserved sample-splitting strategy, and establish its asymptotic selection consistency under some mild conditions. Effectiveness of the proposed selection criterion is demonstrated on a variety of numerical experiments and real-data examples.

笔记与分组