Analysis of Multifactor Affine Yield Curve Models
多因子仿射收益率曲线模型分析AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论无套利债券价格、随机贴现因子及可观测和潜在因子,直接对应资产定价与金融因子。
多因子仿射收益率曲线模型分析AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In finance and economics much work has been done on the theoretical modeling and statistical estimation of the yield curve, defined as the relationship between (−1/τ) log pt(τ) and τ, where pt(τ) is the time t price of a zero-coupon bond with payoff 1 at maturity date t+τ. Of considerable current interest are models of the yield curve in which a collection of observed and latent factors determine the market price of factor risks, the stochastic discount factor, and the arbitrage-free bond prices. The model is particularly interesting from a statistical perspective, because the yields are complicated nonlinear functions of the underlying parameters (e.g., those appearing in the evolution dynamics of the factors and those appearing in the model of the factor risks). This nonlinearity tends to produce a likelihood function that is multimodal. In this article we revisit the question of how such models should be fit from the Bayesian viewpoint. Key aspects of the inferential framework include (a) a prior on the parameters of the model that is motivated by economic considerations, in particular, those involving the slope of the implied yield curve; (b) posterior simulation of the parameters in ways to improve the efficiency of the MCMC output, for example, through sampling of the parameters marginalized over the factors and tailoring of the proposal densities in the Metropolis–Hastings steps using information about the mode and curvature of the current target based on the output of a simulating annealing algorithm; and (c) measures to mitigate numerical instabilities in the fitting through reparameterizations and square root filtering recursions. We apply the techniques to explain the monthly yields on nine U.S. Treasury Bills (with maturities ranging from 1 month to 120 months) over the period January 1986–December 2005. The model contains three factors, one latent and two observed. We also consider the problem of predicting the nine yields for each month of 2006. We show that the (multi-step-ahead) prediction regions properly bracket the actual yields in those months, thus highlighting the practical value of the fitted model.