跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用 GMM 与工具变量模型的非嵌套检验,虽允许动态和序列相关,但缺少特定宏观或微观领域依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Richard J. Smith

广义矩估计竞争模型的非嵌套检验

研究问题
当竞争模型均由 GMM 估计、却采用不同矩条件与工具变量有效性假设时,如何进行非嵌套比较,并容许异方差和序列相关?
方法与思路
作者构造 Cox 型与涵盖检验,允许条件期望的条件集不同,并将结果具体化到工具变量线性回归,给出检验统计量的回归形式。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该框架可比较工具变量有效性假设不同的竞争模型,并在适当混合条件下容许未知形式的异方差和序列相关。
阅读关注点
应核对两模型矩条件的关系、统计量构造中的任意性、混合与协方差估计条件,以及检验拒绝时能够得出的模型比较结论。
阅读边界
原文说明未详列正则条件;仅凭所给摘要不能确认检验的全部有效性条件、有限样本表现,或拒绝一个模型是否足以支持另一个。

原文摘要

Non-nested tests are proposed for competing models estimated by generalized method of moments. Results are presented for non-nested linear regression models with het- eroskedasticity and serial correlation of unknown form and differing instrument validity assumptions. Regression forms of the statistics are also presented. THIS PAPER IS CONCERNED with providing a procedure whereby non-nested models estimated by generalized method of moments (GMM) (Hansen (1982)) may be com- pared. In particular, Cox-type (Cox (1961, 1962)) and encompassing tests (Mizon and Richard (1986)) are proposed. Implicit in such tests is a degree of arbitrariness in the way the statistics are constructed as, typically, the assumptions underlying GMM estima- tion techniques are minimal and do not fully specify the data generation process (DGP) underlying the observable random variables, in contradistinction to the method of maximum likelihood. Our procedures allow the population moment conditions on which GMM estimation of the competing models is based to differ in the conditioning sets under which conditional expectation is taken; such differences may reflect different a priori assumptions concerning the exogeneity status of random variables in the models. These tests may be regarded as generalizations of Singleton (1985). More recent work includes Ghysels and Hall (1990) which requires the specification of the DGP under the null hypothesis and Wooldridge (1990b) which proposes heteroskedasticity-robust tests for non-nested non-linear regression models. Our results are specialized to provide non-nested tests for competing regression models estimated by instrumental variables, where we allow a degree of heteroskedastic- ity and serial correlation in the process generating the disturbance terms, by assuming appropriate mixing conditions (White (1984)), and the instrument validity assumptions to differ across the models; cf. Godfrey (1983, 1984) which assume a scalar covariance matrix for the disturbances and that the set of instruments is valid in both models. Thus, our framework includes models which may be both simultaneous and dynamic. Section 2 describes procedures for obtaining Cox-type and encompassing tests for competing models estimated by GMM. Section 3 specializes these results to competing linear regression models estimated by instrumental variables; regression forms for the statistics are presented. The paper is concluded by Section 4. In our presentation, we eschew detailed regularity assumptions.

笔记与分组