跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究二元条件方差、波动率差异及多元 ARCH 效应检验。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Emma M. Iglesias

二元 ARCH 模型:QML 估计的有限样本性质及 LM 型检验应用

研究问题
在二元条件异方差模型中,两条方差方程的截距差异为何可能造成较大 QML 偏差或方差,如何改善相关检验?
方法与思路
作者分析两类二元模型的 QML 偏差与方差,利用偏差表达式修正估计量,并结合期望 Hessian 构造 LM 型检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,较大的方差截距差异可导致严重估计问题;模拟显示偏差修正与期望 Hessian 可改善检验的有限样本尺寸。
阅读关注点
应核对两类模型的参数设定、偏差与方差结果的适用范围,以及修正检验相对传统方法的尺寸和功效表现。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,不能将两类模型的结论推广到所有多元 ARCH;摘要未提供修正幅度和完整模拟条件。

原文摘要

This paper provides two main new results: the first shows theoretically that large biases and variances can arise when the quasi-maximum likelihood (QML) estimation method is employed in a simple bivariate structure under the assumption of conditional heteroskedasticity; and the second demonstrates how these analytical theoretical results can be used to improve the finite-sample performance of a test for multivariate autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (ARCH) effects, suggesting an alternative to a traditional Bartlett-type correction. We analyze two models: one proposed in Wong and Li (1997, Biometrika 84, 111–123) and another proposed by Engle and Kroner (1995, Econometric Theory 11, 122–150) and Liu and Polasek (1999, Modelling and Decisions in Economics; 2000, working paper, University of Basel). We prove theoretically that a relatively large difference between the intercepts in the two conditional variance equations, which leads to the two series having correspondingly different volatilities in the restricted case, may produce very large variances in some QML estimators in the first model and very severe biases in some QML estimators in the second. Later we use our bias expressions to propose an LM-type test of multivariate ARCH effects and show through simulations that small-sample improvements are possible, especially in relation to the size, when we bias correct the estimators and use the expected hessian version of the test.Both authors thank H. Wong for providing us with the Gauss program to simulate the Wong and Li (1997) model. We also thank three anonymous referees for extremely helpful comments, and we are grateful for the comments received at seminars given at Cardiff University, Michigan State University, Queen Mary London, University of Exeter, and University of Montreal. We acknowledge gratefully also the financial support from an ESRC grant (award number T026 27 1238). A previous version of this paper appeared as IVIE Working paper 2004-09.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文