Assessing Influence in Variable Selection Problems
变量选择问题中的观测影响评估AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般回归的变量选择与影响诊断,没有所列领域细分的直接应用语境。
变量选择问题中的观测影响评估AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Variable selection techniques are often used in combination with multiple linear regression to produce a parsimonious model that fits the data well. It is clearly undesirable for the final model to depend strongly on the inclusion of a few influential cases in the data set. This article discusses a measure of influence of single cases on the final model, based on a similar measure used in ordinary multiple regression. When variables are selected objectively, deletion of individual cases can strongly affect the choice of model. The influence of individual cases on the parameters of the selected model are often assessed as part of the model building process. However, such conditional measures fail to evaluate the influence of the cases on the variable selection process. Modern computing environments make it feasible to use an unconditional criterion to determine the influence of each case on the selection procedure. A number of examples are discussed to illustrate the differences between these approaches. Heuristics are developed to explain the examples. We conclude that, although the conditional approach gives valuable information about the selected model, the use of the unconditional approach can lead to greater insight about the influence of individual observations on the process of model selection.