Default priors and predictive performance in Bayesian model averaging, with application to growth determinants
贝叶斯模型平均中的默认先验与预测表现:增长决定因素应用AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦通用线性回归模型平均与先验比较,增长应用未明确对应所列宏观面板或时间序列预测方向。
贝叶斯模型平均中的默认先验与预测表现:增长决定因素应用AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Bayesian model averaging (BMA) has become widely accepted as a way of accounting for model uncertainty, notably in regression models for identifying the determinants of economic growth. To implement BMA the user must specify a prior distribution in two parts: a prior for the regression parameters and a prior over the model space. Here we address the issue of which default prior to use for BMA in linear regression. We compare 12 candidate parameter priors: the unit information prior (UIP) corresponding to the BIC or Schwarz approximation to the integrated likelihood, a proper data-dependent prior, and 10 priors considered by Fernández et al. (Journal of Econometrics 2001; 100: 381–427). We also compare two model priors: the uniform model prior and a prior with prior expected model size 7. We compare them on the basis of cross-validated predictive performance on a well-known growth dataset and on two simulated examples from the literature. We found that the UIP with uniform model prior generally outperformed the other priors considered. It also identified the largest set of growth determinants. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.