跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般多重检验方法,没有所列经济学领域细分的直接证据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Haibing Zhao
Huijuan Zhou

独立性下的 τ 截断加权 Benjamini–Hochberg 程序

研究问题
在多重检验中,如何利用数据学习 p 值权重,同时避免过拟合、维持有限样本错误发现率控制并提高检验功效?
方法与思路
作者提出留一法与利用各 p 值部分信息的两种权重构造,通过信息遮蔽和零假设条件分布建立控制,并加入零假设比例估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,两种构造为 p 值遮蔽提供新思路,并允许将零假设比例自适应机制纳入权重,以改善检验功效。
阅读关注点
应核对独立性条件、τ 截断和权重遮蔽的定义、有限样本控制的证明,以及零假设比例估计与权重自适应的衔接。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断相关 p 值下是否有效,也不能认定所有权重学习方式或比例估计都维持错误发现率控制。

原文摘要

Abstract In the field of multiple hypothesis testing, auxiliary information can be leveraged to enhance the efficiency of test procedures. A common way to make use of auxiliary information is by weighting p-values. However, when the weights are learned from data, controlling the finite-sample false discovery rate becomes challenging, and most existing weighted procedures only guarantee false discovery rate control in an asymptotic limit. In a recent study conducted by Ignatiadis & Huber (2021), a novel τ-censored weighted Benjamini–Hochberg procedure was proposed to control the finite-sample false discovery rate. The authors employed the cross-weighting approach to learn weights for the p-values. This approach randomly splits the data into several folds and constructs a weight for each p-value Pi using the p-values outside the fold containing Pi. Cross-weighting does not exploit the p-value information inside the fold and only balances the weights within each fold, which may result in a loss of power. In this article, we introduce two methods for constructing data-driven weights for τ-censored weighted Benjamini–Hochberg procedures under independence. They provide new insight into masking p-values to prevent overfitting in multiple testing. The first method utilizes a leave-one-out technique, where all but one of the p-values are used to learn a weight for each p-value. This technique masks the information of a p-value in its weight by calculating the infimum of the weight with respect to the p-value. The second method uses partial information from each p-value to construct weights and utilizes the conditional distributions of the null p-values to establish false discovery rate control. Additionally, we propose two methods for estimating the null proportion and demonstrate how to integrate null-proportion adaptivity into the proposed weights to improve power.

笔记与分组