跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接检验处理效应异质性是否改变个体最优处理选择,对应因果推断中的异质性效应分析。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Chengchun Shi
Wenbin Lu
Rui Song

基于稀疏随机投影的整体定性处理效应检验

研究问题
在高维预后协变量下,如何检验是否存在使最优处理选择随患者特征改变的定性处理效应,而非仅估计个体化方案?
方法与思路
作者用样本分割和处理对比函数的非参数估计构造统计量,并以稀疏随机投影将高维协变量映射到低维空间后进行检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称检验具有一致性,且在规则情形下,其渐近功效函数与使用最优投影矩阵的预言检验相同,并给出模拟和应用。
阅读关注点
应核对定性处理效应的原假设、处理对比函数的识别条件,以及分割和投影选择方式、规则情形定义与功效比较范围。
阅读边界
依据稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要,不能判断刊本变化;摘要未说明处理分配机制及规则条件,预言功效结论不能无条件推广。

原文摘要

In contrast to the classical "one size fits all" approach, precision medicine proposes the customization of individualized treatment regimes to account for patients' heterogeneity in response to treatments. Most of existing works in the literature focused on estimating optimal individualized treatment regimes. However, there has been less attention devoted to hypothesis testing regarding the existence of overall qualitative treatment effects, especially when there is a large number of prognostic covariates. When covariates don't have qualitative treatment effects, the optimal treatment regime will assign the same treatment to all patients regardless of their covariate values. In this paper, we consider testing the overall qualitative treatment effects of patients' prognostic covariates in a high dimensional setting. We propose a sample splitting method to construct the test statistic, based on a nonparametric estimator of the contrast function. When the dimension of covariates is large, we construct the test based on sparse random projections of covariates into a low-dimensional space. We prove the consistency of our test statistic. In the regular cases, we show the asymptotic power function of our test statistic is asymptotically the same as the "oracle" test statistic which is constructed based on the "optimal" projection matrix. Simulation studies and real data applications validate our theoretical findings.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文