跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究未测量空间混杂下连续暴露效应的识别与双重机器学习估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Brian Gilbert
Abhirup Datta
Joan A. Casey

空间混杂的因果推断框架

研究问题
当未测量混杂具有空间结构时,空间坐标在何种条件下可作为代理,从而识别连续暴露对结果的因果效应?
方法与思路
作者以空间函数可测性及暴露的非空间成分支撑识别,讨论位移干预目标量,并采用灵活回归的双重机器学习进行估计。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称提供不依赖分析模型的空间混杂定义和非参数识别框架,以理论、模拟及孕期颗粒物暴露与出生体重应用展示。
阅读关注点
应核对混杂作为空间函数的可测性要求、暴露支持与位移目标的限制,以及DML的模型形式、收敛条件和空间依赖处理。
阅读边界
这是arXiv预印本,同行评审与期刊接收未核实。摘要不能证明应用满足空间代理假设,也未完整说明DML的稳健性与推断条件。

原文摘要

Over the past few decades, addressing "spatial confounding" has become a major topic in spatial statistics. However, the literature has provided conflicting definitions, and many proposed solutions are tied to specific analysis models and do not address the issue of confounding as it is understood in causal inference. We offer an analysis-model-agnostic definition of spatial confounding as the existence of an unmeasured causal confounder variable with a spatial structure. We present a causal inference framework for nonparametric identification of the causal effect of a continuous exposure on an outcome in the presence of spatial confounding. In particular, we identify two critical additional assumptions that allow the use of the spatial coordinates as a proxy for the unmeasured spatial confounder: the measurability of the confounder as a function of space, which is required for conditional ignorability to hold, and the presence of a non-spatial component in the exposure, required for positivity to hold. We also propose studying a causal estimand based on a "shift intervention" that requires less stringent identifying assumptions than traditional estimands. We then turn to estimation and focus on "double machine learning" (DML), a procedure in which flexible models are used to regress both the exposure and outcome variables on confounders to arrive at a causal estimator with favorable robustness properties and convergence rates. This procedure avoids restrictive assumptions, such as linearity and effect homogeneity, which are typically made in spatial models and which can lead to bias when violated. We demonstrate the advantages of the DML approach analytically and via extensive simulation studies. We apply our methods and reasoning to a study of the effect of fine particulate matter exposure during pregnancy on birthweight in California.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文