Unlocking Retrospective Prevalent Information in EHRs—A Revisit to the Pairwise Pseudolikelihood
利用电子病历中的回顾性既患信息:重新审视成对伪似然AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究左截断发病年龄回归和遗传重复验证,未直接对应所列经济计量细分。
反馈分类问题利用电子病历中的回顾性既患信息:重新审视成对伪似然AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Electronic health records offer abundant data on various diseases and health conditions, enabling researchers to explore the relationship between disease onset age and underlying risk factors.Unlike mortality data, the event of interest is nonterminal, hence, individuals can retrospectively report their disease-onset-age upon recruitment to the study.These individuals, diagnosed with the disease before entering the study, are termed "prevalent." The ascertainment imposes a left truncation condition, also known as a "delayed entry, " because individuals had to survive a certain period before being eligible for enrollment.The standard method to accommodate delayed entry conditions on the entire history up to recruitment, hence, the retrospective prevalent failure times are conditioned upon and cannot participate in estimating the disease-onset-age distribution.Other methods that condition on less information and allow the incorporation of the prevalent observations either bring about numerical and computational difficulties or require statistical assumptions that are violated by most biobanks.This work presents a novel estimator of the coefficients in a regression model for the age-at-onset, successfully using the prevalent data.Asymptotic results are provided, and simulations are conducted to showcase the substantial efficiency gain.In particular, the method is highly useful in leveraging large-scale repositories for replication analysis of genetic variants.Indeed, analysis of urinary bladder cancer data reveals that the proposed approach yields about twice as many replicated discoveries compared to the popular approach.Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.