Likelihood functions in finite population sampling theory
有限总体抽样理论中的似然函数AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论一般有限总体抽样与似然原则,没有面板、因果效应或其他所列领域的直接文本依据,因此暂不分类。
有限总体抽样理论中的似然函数AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Both conventional randomization models and prediction, i.e. superpopulation, models for finite populations are discussed from the viewpoint of the likelihood axiom. It is argued that finite populations do fall within the scope of this axiom, and that the likelihood function, when properly defined and interpreted, can play the same fundamental role in finite population theory as it does elsewhere in statistical inference. Under a multivariate normal regression model, the relationship between the likelihood function for the population total and the probability distribution of the minimum variance unbiased estimator is studied. The anticipated result, that this estimator maximizes the likelihood function, is shown to hold under the most familiar models, but an example shows it to be false in general. The role of balanced samples in providing robust inferences is discussed briefly. Conditions are described under which the likelihood function is unchanged by the addition of a new regressor to the model.