跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要涉及生存分析和通用变量关联检验,未明确对应所列经济计量细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Qixian Zhong
Jonas Mueller
Jane-Ling Wang

深度 Cox 模型的变量显著性检验

研究问题
当 Cox 模型的非参数链接由深度神经网络估计且事件时间存在删失时,如何检验特定协变量与事件时间的关联?
方法与思路
作者通过样本划分和交叉拟合构造神经网络估计量与检验统计量,分析估计收敛速度、原假设分布及检验一致性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称检验统计量在原假设下渐近正态、在备择下具有一致性,并讨论利用低维结构缓解维度灾难的能力。
阅读关注点
应核对删失机制、链接函数的低维结构和网络复杂度条件,以及交叉拟合如何控制估计误差与检验水平。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;删失与结构条件未展开,显著关联不能解释为因果作用,也不能保证任意高维情形有效。

原文摘要

Deep learning has become enormously popular in the analysis of complex data, including event time measurements with censoring. To date, deep survival methods have mainly focused on prediction. Such methods are scarcely used in matters of statistical inference such as hypothesis testing. Due to their black-box nature, deep-learned outcomes lack interpretability which limits their use for decision-making in biomedical applications. This article provides estimation and inference methods for the nonparametric Cox model—a flexible family of models with a nonparametric link function to avoid model misspecification. Here we assume the nonparametric link function is modeled via a deep neural network. To perform statistical inference, we use sample splitting and cross-fitting procedures to get neural network estimators and construct test statistic. These procedures enable us to propose a new significance test to examine the association of certain covariates with event times. We establish convergence rates of the neural network estimators, and show that deep learning can overcome the curse of dimensionality in nonparametric regression by learning to exploit low-dimensional structures underlying the data. In addition, we show that our test statistic converges to a normal distribution under the null hypothesis and establish its consistency, in terms of the Type II error, under the alternative hypothesis. Numerical simulations and a real data application demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed test. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文