跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用超高维回归的不确定性量化,没有具体因果、面板、宏观或金融研究对象。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Randy C. S. Lai
Jan Hannig
Thomas C. M. Lee

超高维回归的广义信赖推断

研究问题
在稀疏的超高维线性回归中,除选择非零系数外,如何量化模型选择与参数估计的不确定性,并获得有频率学性质的区间推断?
方法与思路
作者使用广义信赖推断,在候选模型集合上构造概率描述,并为相应参数建立置信区间,同时讨论与客观贝叶斯模型选择的联系。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该方法具有正确的渐近频率学性质,并通过模拟和实际数据评估;其重点贡献是将不确定性量化纳入超高维模型分析。
阅读关注点
应核对稀疏性和维数增长条件、模型概率的定义与计算,以及置信区间的覆盖对象,区分参数推断保证和模型选择方面的保证。
阅读边界
依据稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要。渐近性质的具体形式、计算限制和有限样本覆盖未说明,首次应用说法仅为作者陈述,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

In recent years, the ultrahigh-dimensional linear regression problem has attracted enormous attention from the research community. Under the sparsity assumption, most of the published work is devoted to the selection and estimation of the predictor variables with nonzero coefficients. This article studies a different but fundamentally important aspect of this problem: uncertainty quantification for parameter estimates and model choices. To be more specific, this article proposes methods for deriving a probability density function on the set of all possible models, and also for constructing confidence intervals for the corresponding parameters. These proposed methods are developed using the generalized fiducial methodology, which is a variant of Fisher’s controversial fiducial idea. Theoretical properties of the proposed methods are studied, and in particular it is shown that statistical inference based on the proposed methods will have correct asymptotic frequentist property. In terms of empirical performance, the proposed methods are tested by simulation experiments and an application to a real dataset. Finally, this work can also be seen as an interesting and successful application of Fisher’s fiducial idea to an important and contemporary problem. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time that the fiducial idea is being applied to a so-called “large p small n” problem. A connection to objective Bayesian model selection is also discussed.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文