跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕 Manski 最大得分估计及其平滑和积分版本展开,这一方法体系直接对应离散选择模型的半参数估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Sung Jae Jun
Joris Pinkse
Yuanyuan Wan

积分得分估计

研究问题
Manski 最大得分估计的 Laplace 型版本,能否在适当条件下改善误差分布与区间宽度,并提供适应收敛速率的推断?
方法与思路
作者研究积分得分估计的随机占优关系和收敛速率,提出一致于调参选择的推断、三种偏差消除办法及 Gibbs 抽样算法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,在限定条件及调参范围内,积分得分法可得到较窄区间,并在较弱条件下达到平滑最大得分法的收敛速率。
阅读关注点
应核对局部一阶随机占优的确切含义、调参序列的允许范围,以及偏差消除、参数范数归一化和抽样算法的实现条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 版本摘要,不能确定较弱条件和调参上界的具体形式,也不能将局部比较理解为所有样本下均占优。

原文摘要

We study the properties of the integrated score estimator (ISE), which is the Laplace version of Manski’s maximum score estimator (MMSE). The ISE belongs to a class of estimators whose basic asymptotic properties were studied in Jun, Pinkse, and Wan (2015, Journal of Econometrics 187(1), 201–216). Here, we establish that the MMSE, or more precisely $$\root 3 \of n |\hat \theta _M - \theta _0 |$$ , (locally first order) stochastically dominates the ISE under the conditions necessary for the MMSE to attain its $\root 3 \of n $ convergence rate and that the ISE has the same convergence rate as Horowitz’s smoothed maximum score estimator (SMSE) under somewhat weaker conditions. An implication of the stochastic dominance result is that the confidence intervals of the MMSE are for any given coverage rate wider than those of the ISE, provided that the input parameter α n is not chosen too large. Further, we introduce an inference procedure that is not only rate adaptive as established in Jun et al. (2015), but also uniform in the choice of α n . We propose three different first order bias elimination procedures and we discuss the choice of input parameters. We develop a computational algorithm for the ISE based on the Gibbs sampler and we examine implementational issues in detail. We argue in favor of normalizing the norm of the parameter vector as opposed to fixing one of the coefficients. Finally, we evaluate the computational efficiency of the ISE and the performance of the ISE and the proposed inference procedure in an extensive Monte Carlo study.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文