跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究纵向处理序列的因果效应、主分层与可忽略性假设。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Federico Ricciardi
Alessandra Mattei
Fabrizia Mealli

潜在序贯可忽略性下序贯处理的贝叶斯推断

研究问题
当多个时点的处理参与取决于与未来结局相关的不可观测因素时,如何评估处理序列的因果效应并放宽序贯可忽略性?
方法与思路
作者利用主分层定义潜在序贯可忽略性,在给定既往处理、协变量及潜在分层后约束处理分配,并比较两类假设下的推断。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称理论讨论与模拟表明,序贯可忽略性失效时沿用该假设可能误导推断,而所研究的潜在假设推断表现较稳健。
阅读关注点
核对主分层的定义、两类假设之间的关系及贝叶斯模型设定,检查模拟中后验表现依赖哪些数据生成条件。
阅读边界
所给版本摘要未列出完整识别条件、先验或模拟数值;所述后验表现不能推广为对任意未观测混杂的稳健性保证。

原文摘要

Federico Ricciardia* , Alessandra Matteib & Fabrizia Mealliba Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK; b Department of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications, University of Florence, Florence, ItalySupplementary materials for this article are available online. Please go to www.tandfonline.com/r/JASA.CONTACT Federico Ricciardi f.ricciardi@ucl.ac.uk Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.AbstractWe focus on causal inference for longitudinal treatments, where units are assigned to treatments at multiple time points, aiming to assess the effect of different treatment sequences on an outcome observed at a final point. A common assumption in similar studies is sequential ignorability (SI): treatment assignment at each time point is assumed independent of future potential outcomes given past observed outcomes and covariates. SI is questionable when treatment participation depends on individual choices, and treatment assignment may depend on unobservable quantities associated with future outcomes. We rely on principal stratification to formulate a relaxed version of SI: latent sequential ignorability (LSI) assumes that treatment assignment is conditionally independent on future potential outcomes given past treatments, covariates, and principal stratum membership, a latent variable defined by the joint value of observed and missing intermediate outcomes. We evaluate SI and LSI, using theoretical arguments and simulation studies to investigate the performance of the two assumptions when one holds and inference is conducted under both. Simulations show that when SI does not hold, inference performed under SI leads to misleading conclusions. Conversely, LSI generally leads to correct posterior distributions, irrespective of which assumption holds.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文