Bayesian Inference for Sequential Treatments Under Latent Sequential Ignorability
潜在序贯可忽略性下序贯处理的贝叶斯推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究纵向处理序列的因果效应、主分层与可忽略性假设。
潜在序贯可忽略性下序贯处理的贝叶斯推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Federico Ricciardia* , Alessandra Matteib & Fabrizia Mealliba Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK; b Department of Statistics, Computer Science, Applications, University of Florence, Florence, ItalySupplementary materials for this article are available online. Please go to www.tandfonline.com/r/JASA.CONTACT Federico Ricciardi f.ricciardi@ucl.ac.uk Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.AbstractWe focus on causal inference for longitudinal treatments, where units are assigned to treatments at multiple time points, aiming to assess the effect of different treatment sequences on an outcome observed at a final point. A common assumption in similar studies is sequential ignorability (SI): treatment assignment at each time point is assumed independent of future potential outcomes given past observed outcomes and covariates. SI is questionable when treatment participation depends on individual choices, and treatment assignment may depend on unobservable quantities associated with future outcomes. We rely on principal stratification to formulate a relaxed version of SI: latent sequential ignorability (LSI) assumes that treatment assignment is conditionally independent on future potential outcomes given past treatments, covariates, and principal stratum membership, a latent variable defined by the joint value of observed and missing intermediate outcomes. We evaluate SI and LSI, using theoretical arguments and simulation studies to investigate the performance of the two assumptions when one holds and inference is conducted under both. Simulations show that when SI does not hold, inference performed under SI leads to misleading conclusions. Conversely, LSI generally leads to correct posterior distributions, irrespective of which assumption holds.