Efficient detection of random coefficients in autoregressive models
自回归模型随机系数的有效检测AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究 AR 与随机系数 AR 模型之间的时间序列检验。
自回归模型随机系数的有效检测AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The problem of detecting randomness in the coefficients of an AR(p) model, that is, the problem of testing ordinary AR(p) dependence against the alternative of a random coefficient autoregressive [RCAR(p)] model is considered. A nonstandard LAN property is established for RCAR(p) models in the vicinity of AR(p) ones. Two main problems arise in this context. The first problem is related to the statistical model itself: Gaussian assumptions are highly unrealistic in a nonlinear context, and innovation densities should be treated as nuisance parameters. The resulting semiparametric model however appears to be severely nonadaptive. In contrast with the linear ARMA case, pseudo-Gaussian likelihood methods here are invalid under non-Gaussian densities; even the innovation variance cannot be estimated without a strict loss of efficiency. This problem is solved using a general result by Hallin and Werker, which provides semiparametrically efficient central sequences without going through explicit tangent space calculations. The second problem is related to the fact that the testing problem under study is intrinsically one-sided, while the case of multiparameter one-sided alternatives is not covered by classical asymptotic theory under LAN. A concept of locally asymptotically most stringent somewhere efficient test is proposed in order to cope with this one-sided nature of the problem.