跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以加性分位数回归研究营养状况低分位数及其协变量关系。

反馈分类问题

Identifying Risk Factors for Severe Childhood Malnutrition by Boosting Additive Quantile Regression

用提升法加性分位数回归识别儿童严重营养不良风险因素

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Nora Fenske
Thomas Kneib
Torsten Hothorn

用提升法加性分位数回归识别儿童严重营养不良风险因素

研究问题
如何研究印度儿童营养状况分布低端的风险因素,并在包含非线性效应的分位数模型中选择变量与平滑程度?
方法与思路
作者以印度2005/2006年人口与健康调查为应用,构建半参数加性分位数回归,用提升法联合进行变量选择和模型选择。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该方法能从数据确定非线性效应的平滑程度,比较结果支持其估计和选变量的用途,并提示此前未识别的风险因素。
阅读关注点
应核对低分位数的定义、提升法停止规则、平滑程度选择与比较方法,并检查调查设计及选择后不确定性如何处理。
阅读边界
仅据OpenAlex索引摘要,稿件版本未注明。摘要未说明风险因素名单、效应大小或因果识别依据,比较结果也不能推及所有场景。

原文摘要

We investigated the risk factors for childhood malnutrition in India based on the 2005/2006 Demographic and Health Survey by applying a novel estimation technique for additive quantile regression. Ordinary linear and generalized linear regression models relate the mean of a response variable to a linear combination of covariate effects, and, as a consequence, focus on average properties of the response. The use of such a regression model for analyzing childhood malnutrition in developing or transition countries implies that the estimated effects describe the average nutritional status. However, it is of even greater interest to analyze quantiles of the response distribution, such as the 5% or 10% quantile, which relate to the risk of extreme malnutrition. Our investigation is based on a semiparametric extension of quantile regression models where different types of nonlinear effects are included in the model equation, leading to additive quantile regression. We addressed the variable selection and model choice problems associated with estimating such an additive quantile regression model using a novel boosting approach. Our proposal allows for data-driven determination of the amount of smoothness required for the nonlinear effects and combines model choice with an automatic variable selection property. In an empirical evaluation, we compared our boosting approach with state-of-the-art methods for additive quantile regression. The results suggest that boosting is an appropriate tool for estimation and variable selection in additive quantile regression models and helps to identify yet unknown risk factors for childhood malnutrition. This article has supplementary material online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文