跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要是数据链接、参数识别与披露风险的一般理论,未明确落入给定的领域细分。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Tatiana Komarova
Denis Nekipelov
Evgeny Yakovlev

识别、数据合并与信息披露风险

研究问题
缺少精确个人标识、且不约束共同信息的联合分布时,合并个体数据能否识别参数,披露风险限制又有何影响?
方法与思路
作者分析可观测边际分布与数据链接程序,并基于统计实验的极限引入识别概念,以刻画合并数据的信息含量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在所研究设定中,点识别与披露风险限制不相容;限定披露风险只能部分识别,界域大小与风险上界反向关联。
阅读关注点
应核对披露风险和识别的正式定义、链接程序在有限样本与极限中的作用,以及关键结论依赖的边际分布条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,无法判断风险与识别界域的具体关系或结论对其他合并机制的适用性,也不推断版本变化。

原文摘要

It is commonplace that the data needed for econometric inference are not contained in a single source. In this paper we analyze the problem of parametric inference from combined individual‐level data when data combination is based on personal and demographic identifiers such as name, age, or address. Our main question is the identification of the econometric model based on the combined data when the data do not contain exact individual identifiers and no parametric assumptions are imposed on the joint distribution of information that is common across the combined data set. We demonstrate the conditions on the observable marginal distributions of data in individual data sets that can and cannot guarantee identification of the parameters of interest. We also note that the data combination procedure is essential in a semiparametric setting such as ours. Provided that the (nonparametric) data combination procedure can only be defined in finite samples, we introduce a new notion of identification based on the concept of limits of statistical experiments. Our results apply to the setting where the individual data used for inferences are sensitive and their combination may lead to a substantial increase in the data sensitivity or lead to a “de‐anonymization” of the previously “anonymized” information. We demonstrate that the point identification of an econometric model from combined data is incompatible with restrictions on the risk of individual disclosure. If the data combination procedure guarantees a bound on the risk of individual disclosure, then the information available from the combined data set allows one to identify the parameter of interest only partially, and the size of the identification region is inversely related to the upper bound guarantee for the disclosure risk. This result is new in the context of data combination as we notice that the quality of links that need to be used in the combined data to assure point identification may be much higher than the average link quality in the entire data set, and thus point inference requires the use of the most sensitive subset of the data. Our results provide important insights into the ongoing discourse on the empirical analysis of merged administrative records as well as discussions on the “disclosive” nature of policies implemented by the data‐driven companies (such as internet services companies and medical companies using individual patient records for policy decisions).

笔记与分组
相关领域论文