跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究匹配与平衡加权后的处理效应,尤其是 ATT 的总体推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Xiang Meng
Aaron Smith
Luke Miratrix

匹配或重新加权后的方差估计

研究问题
在处理组较小、控制单位被重复使用的匹配或加权分析中,如何以可行的计算成本估计方差,支持处理效应的总体推断?
方法与思路
作者构造仅需将处理单位匹配到控制单位的方差估计框架,分析其渐近性质,覆盖多类匹配程序并扩展到稳定平衡加权,随后开展模拟比较。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,方差估计量具有一致性和渐近正态性,可支持小处理组情形的 ATT 推断;新框架覆盖多类匹配,模拟中较所比较自助法保持更好覆盖。
阅读关注点
应核对小处理组的渐近设定、控制单位重复使用如何计入方差、新正则条件覆盖哪些匹配程序,以及加权扩展和自助法比较的适用范围。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,不能据此认定已同行评审或期刊接收;摘要未列出正则条件,覆盖改善来自特定模拟,不能推出所有匹配或自助法都具有相同表现。

原文摘要

This paper develops a variance estimation framework for matching estimators that enables valid population inference for treatment effects. We provide theoretical analysis of a variance estimator that addresses key limitations in the existing literature. While Abadie and Imbens (2006) proposed a foundational variance estimator requiring matching for both treatment and control groups, this approach is computationally prohibitive and rarely used in practice. Our method provides a computationally feasible alternative that only requires matching treated units to controls while maintaining theoretical validity for population inference. We make three main contributions. First, we establish consistency and asymptotic normality for our variance estimator, proving its validity for average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) estimation in settings with small treated samples. Second, we develop a generalized theoretical framework with novel regularity conditions that significantly expand the class of matching procedures for which valid inference is available, including radius matching, M-nearest neighbor matching, and propensity score matching. Third, we demonstrate that our approach extends naturally to other causal inference estimators such as stable balancing weighting methods. Through simulation studies across different data generating processes, we show that our estimator maintains proper coverage rates while the state-of-the-art bootstrap method can exhibit substantial undercoverage (dropping from 95% to as low as 61%), particularly in settings with extensive control unit reuse. Our framework provides researchers with both theoretical guarantees and practical tools for conducting valid population inference across a wide range of causal inference applications. An R package implementing our method is available at https://github.com/jche/scmatch2.

笔记与分组