Bayesian Artificial Neural Networks for frontier efficiency analysis
用于前沿效率分析的贝叶斯人工神经网络AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦前沿效率估计,所列细分中没有直接对应项,投入内生性本身也不足以归为因果或结构估计。
用于前沿效率分析的贝叶斯人工神经网络AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Artificial neural networks have offered their share of econometric insights, given their power to model complex relationships. One area where they have not been readily deployed is the estimation of frontiers. The literature on frontier estimation has seen its share of research comparing and contrasting data envelopment analysis (DEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), the two workhorse estimators. These studies rely on both Monte Carlo experiments and actual data sets to examine a range of performance issues which can be used to elucidate insights on the benefits or weaknesses of one method over the other. As can be imagined, neither method is universally better than the other. The present paper proposes an alternative approach that is quite flexible in terms of functional form and distributional assumptions and it amalgamates the benefits of both DEA and SFA. Specifically, we bridge these two popular approaches via Bayesian artificial neural networks while accounting for possible endogeneity of inputs. We examine the performance of this new machine learning approach using Monte Carlo experiments which is found to be very good, comparable to, or often better than, the current standards in the literature. To illustrate the new techniques, we provide an application of this approach to a data set of large US banks.