Proximal survival analysis to handle dependent right censoring
处理依赖性右删失的近端生存分析AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究生存目标与依赖性删失,虽涉及代理识别,但未明确提出处理效应或因果估计目标。
处理依赖性右删失的近端生存分析AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Abstract Many epidemiological and clinical studies aim to analyse a time-to-event endpoint. A common complication is right censoring. In some cases, right censoring occurs when subjects are still surviving after the study terminates or move out of the study area. In such cases, right censoring is typically treated as independent or noninformative. This assumption can be further relaxed to conditional independent censoring by leveraging possibly time-varying covariate information, if available, and assuming censoring and failure time are independent within covariate strata. In yet other instances, events may be censored by other competing events like death and are associated with censoring possibly through prognoses. Realistically, measured covariates can rarely capture all such associations with absolute certainty. In cases of dependent censoring, covariate measurements are often, at best, proxies of underlying prognoses. In this article, we establish a nonparametric identification framework by formally admitting that conditional independent censoring may fail in practice and accounting for covariate measurements as imperfect proxies of underlying association. The framework suggests adaptive estimators, and we provide generic assumptions under which they are consistent, asymptotically normal, and doubly robust. We examine the finite-sample performance of our proposed estimators via a Monte Carlo simulation and apply them to the SEER-Medicare dataset.