跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕期权定价模型与波动率诊断,并分析被定价的跳跃尾部风险,直接对应资产定价、波动率和尾部风险。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Torben G. Andersen
Nicola Fusari
Viktor Todorov

基于期权面板的参数推断与动态状态恢复

研究问题
期权价格含观测误差且时间跨度固定时,如何从越来越丰富的横截面报价估计模型参数、恢复动态状态,并检验定价模型?
方法与思路
作者在时间跨度固定、期权价内外程度维度扩张的框架下估计参数与状态,构造混合高斯推断,并比较期权提取与标的高频估计的即期波动率。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称建立参数与状态的一致估计及多种模型诊断,并在标普500期权中发现被定价的跳跃尾部风险对大幅负冲击的反应比波动率更强、更持久。
阅读关注点
阅读全文时应核对报价误差与横截面覆盖条件、状态可识别性和可行方差估计,并区分逐日拟合检验与风险中性动态稳定性检验。
阅读边界
摘要称模拟在贴近实际的设定中表现良好,但未给出数值表现、具体误差条件及应用稳健性;不能据此判断方法优势或推广尾部风险结论。

原文摘要

We develop a new parametric estimation procedure for option panels observed with error. We exploit asymptotic approximations assuming an ever increasing set of option prices in the moneyness (cross-sectional) dimension, but with a fixed time span. We develop consistent estimators for the parameters and the dynamic realization of the state vector governing the option price dynamics. The estimators converge stably to a mixed-Gaussian law and we develop feasible estimators for the limiting variance. We also provide semiparametric tests for the option price dynamics based on the distance between the spot volatility extracted from the options and one constructed nonparametrically from high-frequency data on the underlying asset. Furthermore, we develop new tests for the day-by-day model fit over specific regions of the volatility surface and for the stability of the risk-neutral dynamics over time. A comprehensive Monte Carlo study indicates that the inference procedures work well in empirically realistic settings. In an empirical application to S&P 500 index options, guided by the new diagnostic tests, we extend existing asset pricing models by allowing for a flexible dynamic relation between volatility and priced jump tail risk. Importantly, we document that the priced jump tail risk typically responds in a more pronounced and persistent manner than volatility to large negative market shocks.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文