跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以一般点过程自助理论为核心,金融应用未说明观测频率,不足以直接归入高频计量。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Giuseppe Cavaliere
Ye Lu
Anders Rahbek

Hawkes 及一般点过程的自助法推断

研究问题
对于 Hawkes 等点过程,如何用自助法开展区间估计与检验,并比较固定强度和递归强度方案的有效性与实施成本?
方法与思路
作者提出跨重复保持条件强度固定的自助法,与递归强度方案比较,并对时间变换后的等待时间进行非参数重抽样。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,论文为两类方案提供自助法渐近理论,建立与 ACD 模型的联系,并通过模拟、金融及社交媒体数据展示效果。
阅读关注点
应核对固定强度具体保留哪些估计对象、时间变换重抽样的条件,以及点过程理论与 ACD 模型之间的对应关系。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 OpenAlex 摘要;有效性条件、事件数据频率及性能数值未说明,无法据此认定某方案在全部点过程上更优。

原文摘要

Inference and testing in general point process models such as the Hawkes model is predominantly based on asymptotic approximations for likelihood-based estimators and tests. As an alternative, and to improve finite sample performance, this paper considers bootstrap-based inference for interval estimation and testing. Specifically, for a wide class of point process models we consider a novel bootstrap scheme labeled ‘fixed intensity bootstrap’ (FIB), where the conditional intensity is kept fixed across bootstrap repetitions. The FIB, which is very simple to implement and fast in practice, extends previous ideas from the bootstrap literature on time series in discrete time, where the so-called ‘fixed design’ and ‘fixed volatility’ bootstrap schemes have shown to be particularly useful and effective. We compare the FIB with the classic recursive bootstrap, which is here labeled ‘recursive intensity bootstrap’ (RIB). In RIB algorithms, the intensity is stochastic in the bootstrap world and implementation of the bootstrap is more involved, due to its sequential structure. For both bootstrap schemes, we provide new bootstrap (asymptotic) theory which allows to assess bootstrap validity, and propose a ‘non-parametric’ approach based on resampling time-changed transformations of the original waiting times. We also establish the link between the proposed bootstraps for point process models and the related autoregressive conditional duration (ACD) models. Lastly, we show effectiveness of the different bootstrap schemes in finite samples through a set of detailed Monte Carlo experiments, and provide applications to both financial data and social media data to illustrate the proposed methodology.

笔记与分组